|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: The State of Native XML databasesAndrew Welch andrew.j.welch at gmail.comTue Aug 21 12:08:07 PDT 2007
On 8/21/07, John Snelson <http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk> wrote: > I think a strong argument could be made that a criteria for being a well > designed XML document is the ability to tell an element's type from it's > name - or at least from the path to it. This is why I said XML /could > be/ self describing. Isn't the difference that one _looks like_ a date, but the other _is_ an xs:date. If you have an operation that compares dates, isn't it wasteful to convert the untyped <date> to an xs:date every time? -- http://andrewjwelch.com
|
Purchase Stylus Studio Online Today!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






