Questions about SQL Server 2005 and XML

[Frank Cohen]

TigerLogic 2.6 will be out shortly that implements the CR. Where can  
I learn the process to provide feedback to the testing taskforce?

-Frank




On Jan 23, 2006, at 2:54 PM, Michael Rys wrote:

> I think at the moment the best way to contribute is to implement  
> the CR
> draft as completely as possible (including some of the "at risk"  
> items),
> and provide feedback to the testing taskforce.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>> [mailto:http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk] On Behalf Of Frank Cohen
>> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 1:10 PM
>> To: http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>> Subject: Re:  Questions about SQL Server 2005 and XML
>>
>> I take that as an invitation to participate. What do you recommend?
>> This will be my first experience with W3C directly.
>>
>> -Frank
>>
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Michael Rys wrote:
>>
>>> Frank I certainly share some of your frustration. But where are the
>>> contributions of RainingData to getting XQuery done quicker?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>> [mailto:http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk] On Behalf Of Frank Cohen
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:27 AM
>>>> To: http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>> Subject: Re:  Questions about SQL Server 2005 and XML
>>>>
>>>> <rant>With XQuery we're not talking about a protocol for document
>>>> schemas, we're talking about a spec for a language. If Java
>>>> took this
>>>> long we would all be programming in C today - or maybe
>> Cobol.</rant>
>>>> <author>Frank</author>
>>>> <ps>I would have typed this faster but the spec isn't
>>>> finished yet.</ps>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 22, 2006, at 11:35 PM, Ken North wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am pretty tired of waiting for the XQuery 1.0 spec to be final.
>>>>>
>>>>> You may be experiencing personal frustration about the XQuery
>>>>> timeline, but five
>>>>> years is by far not the longest development timeline.
>>>>>
>>>>> The timeline to evolve GML into the SGML standard was 17 years.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>
>