[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Questions about SQL Server 2005 and XML

Michael Rys mrys at microsoft.com
Mon Jan 23 14:54:51 PST 2006


sql server xml promotion
I think at the moment the best way to contribute is to implement the CR
draft as completely as possible (including some of the "at risk" items),
and provide feedback to the testing taskforce.

Best regards
Michael 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk 
> [mailto:http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk] On Behalf Of Frank Cohen
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 1:10 PM
> To: http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
> Subject: Re:  Questions about SQL Server 2005 and XML
> 
> I take that as an invitation to participate. What do you recommend?  
> This will be my first experience with W3C directly.
> 
> -Frank
> 
> 
> On Jan 23, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Michael Rys wrote:
> 
> > Frank I certainly share some of your frustration. But where are the
> > contributions of RainingData to getting XQuery done quicker?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Michael
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
> >> [mailto:http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk] On Behalf Of Frank Cohen
> >> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:27 AM
> >> To: http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
> >> Subject: Re:  Questions about SQL Server 2005 and XML
> >>
> >> <rant>With XQuery we're not talking about a protocol for document
> >> schemas, we're talking about a spec for a language. If Java
> >> took this
> >> long we would all be programming in C today - or maybe 
> Cobol.</rant>
> >> <author>Frank</author>
> >> <ps>I would have typed this faster but the spec isn't
> >> finished yet.</ps>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jan 22, 2006, at 11:35 PM, Ken North wrote:
> >>
> >>> Frank,
> >>>
> >>>> I am pretty tired of waiting for the XQuery 1.0 spec to be final.
> >>>
> >>> You may be experiencing personal frustration about the XQuery
> >>> timeline, but five
> >>> years is by far not the longest development timeline.
> >>>
> >>> The timeline to evolve GML into the SGML standard was 17 years.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
> >>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
> >> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
> > http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
> 



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2007 All Rights Reserved.