|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] SQL Server 2005Michael Rys mrys at microsoft.comMon Jan 23 01:37:41 PST 2006
> Michael Rys wrote: > > > 1) I am not going to evangelize functionality that I do not > implement... > > And it is not my problem if nobody writes about it... > > This is precisely the kind of steady business focus that has given > Microsoft a black eye in the idealistic world of programmers. Shame, > shame ;) :-). LOL. Sorry about that then ;) > > 3) As Kent says, you should use PATH mode in most cases. > EXPLICIT mode > > should only be used under the following circumstances: > > 1. You already have it running... > > 2. Sometimes it still executes faster than nested FOR XML > PATH but not > > always. > > 3. You are a masochist... > > Looks like I need to take a closer look at FOR XML PATH... Here is a whitepaper that shows what you can do with it and compares it to the EXPLICIT mode: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnsql90/html/forxml2k5.asp > -- Ron > > _______________________________________________ > http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk > http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






