SQL Server 2005

[Frank Cohen]

Thanks. I've been through that issue before and am careful of license  
terms.

My method is to take the average software developer's point of view  
when evaluating a technology for performance and developer  
productivity. I then published a kit that shows step-by-step  
instructions to build a use case and test it. The kit is distributed  
under an open-source license. I think the publisher's see this as a  
fair approach so I haven't had a problem. See my latest kit at:  
http://www.pushtotest.com/Downloads/kits/soakit.html

Microsoft products had a EULA that restricted performance testing. Is  
that still the case?

-Frank




On Jan 21, 2006, at 7:41 PM, Michael Rys wrote:

> Thanks
>
> Please be careful with publishing perf results for Oracle and SQL
> Server. I think they have restrictive licensing terms regarding  
> that....
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>> [mailto:http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk] On Behalf Of Frank Cohen
>> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 5:35 PM
>> To: http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>> Subject: Re:  SQL Server 2005
>>
>> Hi Michael:
>>
>>> Since I don't like to register to just comment on a blog, here is a
>>> quick comment:
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback. I changed the XQueryNow.com site to allow
>> anonymous comments.
>>
>>> Your comment about that FOR XML is not good to manage XML data is
>>> correct, but also off the point: that's not its purpose...
>>>
>>> FOR XML is not meant to be used for managing XML data. It
>> is meant to
>>> provide an effective and simple way to transform relational
>> data into
>>> XML form.
>>>
>>> The XML data type and XQuery and XML-DML are meant for
>> managing XML
>>> data
>>> that is not relational in nature.
>>
>> Good point and I agree with you about the purpose of the XML field
>> type, XQuery and FOR XML commands being there to support XML in a
>> relational model. I'll post this as a comment to the blog entry for
>> other readers.
>>
>>> You better look at the XML data type and the (at the moment only
>>> subset)
>>> support of XQuery. Critique in that area would be much more
>>> appropriate
>>> for this list and more useful.
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion. I'm happy to offer a critique of
>> using XML
>> in a relational model and will post a critique to this list. I'm
>> working on a performance and scalability study that among other
>> things compares performance of native XML DB tools to relational
>> tools that will back up a critique.
>>
>> -Frank
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2006, at 1:15 PM, Michael Rys wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Frank
>>>
>>> Since I don't like to register to just comment on a blog, here is a
>>> quick comment:
>>>
>>> Your comment about that FOR XML is not good to manage XML data is
>>> correct, but also off the point: that's not its purpose...
>>>
>>> FOR XML is not meant to be used for managing XML data. It
>> is meant to
>>> provide an effective and simple way to transform relational
>> data into
>>> XML form.
>>>
>>> The XML data type and XQuery and XML-DML are meant for
>> managing XML
>>> data
>>> that is not relational in nature.
>>>
>>> You better look at the XML data type and the (at the moment only
>>> subset)
>>> support of XQuery. Critique in that area would be much more
>>> appropriate
>>> for this list and more useful.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> Disclosure: I am the Program Manager for XML data type,
>> XQuery and FOR
>>> XML in SQL Server 2005
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>> [mailto:http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk] On Behalf Of Frank Cohen
>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 9:58 AM
>>>> To: http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>> Subject:  SQL Server 2005
>>>>
>>>> Maybe SQL Server 2005 has some new secret sauce for handling XML
>>>> data. I ran across Jerry Dixon's article in which he talks
>> about the
>>>> new XML features. Jerry writes from a software developer
>> perspective
>>>> that seems true: He likes the new XML features but uses them to
>>>> create XML, not to store XML.
>>>>
>>>> I blog about this at:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.xquerynow.com/cohensxblog/sql2005.html
>>>>
>>>> -Frank
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Frank Cohen, Raining Data, http://www.RainingData.com, phone:
>>>> 408 236
>>>> 7604
>>>> http://www.xquerynow.com for free XML, XQuery and native XML
>>>> database
>>>> tips,
>>>> techniques and solutions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>> http://xquery.com/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>
>