|
[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] unordered {} and fn:unordered()Bas de Bakker bas at x-hive.comThu Jan 19 12:43:56 PST 2006
Michael Kay wrote: > There may be > optimisations one can do in unordered mode, but as far as I'm concerned > they're not very high up my list - apart from anything else, it's much more > important to optimize badly written queries than to optimize well-written > ones. That is an interesting point. Because I have always thought it more important to optimize well written queries than badly written ones! Let's assume I have the time to implement one optimization and can choose between: 1) An optimization that basically turns the badly written query into the well written query. 2) An optimization that evaluates the well written query (only) in a faster way. I have usually chosen option 2, because it allows the user (maybe with some effort) to get a faster performing query, which for some users is very important. If I choose option 1, there is simply no way at all for the user to get the performance he could get with option 2. Regards, Bas de Bakker X-Hive Corporation
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|






