[XQuery Talk Mailing List Archive Home] [By Date] [By Thread] [By Subject] [By Author] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

a conceptual clarification

Michael Kay mhk at mhk.me.uk
Fri Mar 4 12:16:09 PST 2005


  a conceptual clarification
Following from this, will it be correct to assume that  the appearance of a
let statement after a for statement be also treated as equally undesirable
and error-prone programming technique in XQuery (because in course of
iteration,  a let statement is then forced to rebind  the same variable name
say  $x several times, probably forcing it to bind to a new value each
time).  
 
No, of course not. In this case there is no possible risk of confusion about
which declaration the variable reference is referring to.
 
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/ 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://xquery.com/pipermail/talk/attachments/20050304/69b6fd24/attachment.htm


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2011 All Rights Reserved.