[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: How should a two-digit airport runway number berepresented

• From: Thomas Passin <list1@tompassin.net>
• To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
• Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 13:13:26 -0400

On 6/24/2024 11:36 AM, Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote:

"Runways, all runways, have a 2-digit number that represents the magnetic heading of the runway to the nearest 10 degrees. If the runway's heading is 265 — 274 degrees, then the runway number is 27 — always drop the last “0.” The opposite end of the runway is 180 degrees apart, so Runway 09 (90 degrees)."

How to represent a runway number in XML?

As ever, “it depends”. Without knowing more about the context, I can only appeal to my aesthetic sense and intuition.

What do you think? Which form is better?

Given that the computer doesn’t care if it’s 9 or 09, I’d probably store the value as 09. That will be familiar and natural to a human pilot familiar with reading runway signs. Or an experienced technical writer used to documenting airport designs.

Don’t confuse the human is always a good design choice.

                                         Be seeing you,
                                           norm

--
Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
https://norm.tovey-walsh.com/

The test of courage comes when we are in the minority. The test of
tolerance comes when we are in the majority.--Ralph W. Sockman

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: How should a two-digit airport runway number berepresented in XML?
    • From: Debbie Lapeyre <dalapeyre@mulberrytech.com>

• References:
  • How should a two-digit airport runway number be represented in XML?
    • From: Roger L Costello <costello@mitre.org>
  • Re: How should a two-digit airport runway number berepresented in XML?
    • From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>