[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
Fwd: Re: How long before services sending/receiving XMLmight n
- From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
- To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 09:20:27 +0000

Data sent to a government body usually has to be deleted after a certain period of time. It cannot be kept longer than is needed. While it is being kept, it could be kept in a system, so the original message might not be what is kept. When I worked in public sector I used to encourage my colleagues to keep the original messages for audit to look at (typically a year after the data exchange), but there was not much appetite for that. Obviously such details of data processing will vary a lot.
I think you are still framing the question differently than I
would. It sounds like you regard the data as a transient artifact,
and the real value lies in the computation done at the origin end
or at the receiving end in the present time.
But when you said, "governments currently require data or
documents to be sent to them in XML format", I'm thinking of that
data as a potentially valuable and long-lasting asset in its own
right. 20 years later, someone in the government may want to read
the second paragraph of the document you sent back in 2021,
because it answers a question they will have then.
Right now, I am in an email conversation with someone about a
community project I worked on in year 2000. I am looking through
the archive of files and email that were on my computer 21 years
ago to answer their questions. The data or documents I used then,
I stored in the formats I was using back then. I did some
computation (reading, editing, printing, discussing, whatever) on
the content at the time, and their formats served that purpose.
But they have a additional value now for what they can remind me
about the old project. The formats I chose then affect the value
of this content to me today. That experience teaches me to choose
formats today that are likely to still be usable in the future.
Best regards,
—Jim DeLaHunt
On 2021-11-13 00:50, Stephen D Green
wrote:
Hi Jim
Isn’t that on an assumption that the data is
persisted in the format it was exchanged? Wouldn’t it be more
likely that the exchange format will be transient, deleted
immediately it has been deserialised?
Regards
Stephen Green
Stephen:
Your question below frames the choice as about
serialisation options ("is there more reason to
serialize it as XML or as another format"). I would
instead frame the choice as about what kind of
information artifact do you want to have: a pile of
information encoded using XML, or using CSV, or using
JSON? I would make that choice in part with an eye to
how long will that pile of information persist, and what
someone might want to do with it 20 or 30 years in the
future.
What I take from the conversation on this list is that
if the information is encoded using the right XML
language (and schema etc.) then it will be a more
comprehensible, re-usable, and thus more valuable asset
in future decades with future systems, than will be the
same information encoded as CSV, or worse yet, JSON. I
could be wrong about that. I'm not an expert.
But I do think that it matters how you frame the
choice.
—Jim DeLaHunt
On 2021-11-12 04:58, Stephen D Green wrote:
Given that systems typically hold data
in some kind of code model before it is serialized to
a final character encoded format required by the
government such as XML, CSV (yes, right) or JSON, is
there more reason to serialize it as XML or as another
format such as CSV or JSON? Or is serialization to
JSON so commonplace that there is little reason to
look any further if given the choice? I could
understand it if serialization to JSON poses a problem
when the government puts necessary constraints on that
JSON. Is the understanding of the practicalities of
the possibilities for constraining the final,
transferred data/document a reason to stick with XML?
UTF-*, escaping, choices of alternatives in the text
syntax, etcetera?
Hi
XML Dev’ers,
Do you have any opinion on how
long software systems communicating with each
other (one-way or two-way) using XML might be
able to continue to use XML this way? If, say,
governments currently require data or documents
to be sent to them in XML format, what
professional advice would you suggest about how
long would be reasonable before this use of XML
should be replaced? Or do you think such uses of
XML could reasonably be perpetual?
Many thanks for your
consideration.
Stephen Green
--
--
--
--
. --Jim DeLaHunt, jdlh@jdlh.com http://blog.jdlh.com/ (http://jdlh.com/)
multilingual websites consultant
2201-1000 Beach Ave, Vancouver BC V6E 4M2, Canada
Canada mobile +1-604-376-8953
--
--
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0 |
 |
Atom 0.3 |
 |
|
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|