Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] =?UTF-8?Q?Re:__The_Goals_of_XML_at_25,_and_the_one_thing_that_X
 I'm not sure that pom.xml is a good use of XML... but at the end of the day, maybe groovy isn't either! IMHO the biggest mistake is thinking that any *one* syntax will solve for every use case. Markdown is great for simple documents, but pretty horrible for complex documents. JSON is great for ad-hoc interchange, not so great for RPC or documents. XML is pretty good as a document archival/interchange format, not so great for RPC/data interchange (unless it's text heavy). S-expressions are nice for exchanging little expressions (vs JSON AST serializations/query languages), etc. etc. The one thing I do see a lot of is trying to jam a round peg into square hole, or a square peg into a round hole based on dogma: there are some really monstrous JSON uses out there (and I've been guilty of a few). The sad fact is that a lot of technology adoption is driven by popularity contests, not informed decisions. One thing I find amusing is that some modern browser frameworks are kind of reinventing generic markup, and in a very convoluted way. That's why I do wonder about XML in the browser... maybe a subset as Rick suggests, maybe not, but there are a lot of use-cases that could still be met (and yes, I am familiar with XAML, XUL et al). On Tue, Jul 20, 2021, at 3:42 AM, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
