[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: xml:base and fragments
On May 10, 2017, at 8:52 AM, John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com> wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Andrew S. Townley <ast@atownley.org> wrote: >> You’re right. The specification doesn’t say anything about >> retrieval other than if the relative and base URI resolve to the >> same base URI, then dereferencing “should not” result in a new >> retrieval action. > Note that that "should not" is in lower case: it is not an RFC 2119 > requirement. Sigh. Is there something in RFC 2119 that says the keywords must be uppercased? I didn’t find it. It’s common practice, but if it’s required, where is the requirement stated? In RFC 3986, I see no uppercased words; I don’t believe that that shows it to have no normative content. ******************************************** C. M. Sperberg-McQueen Black Mesa Technologies LLC cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com http://www.blackmesatech.com ********************************************
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|