[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: (was: Software lock in?)
On 23 March 2017 at 14:34, Steve Newcomb <srn@coolheads.com> wrote: > On 03/22/2017 07:54 PM, Peter Flynn wrote: >> >> Given that hardly any automotive documentation is in XML (or even SGML) >> any more ("too hard"), it's probably moot for this group, unless we want >> to start a user-supported tractor-documentation project:- > > > I would argue, smilingly, that Peter's "too hard" observation is on-topic. > Dead center, even. Is XML the future of XML? Such a question can never be > ruled out-of-order. > > If the XML community doesn't choose to respond to change, or even > acknowledge it, it is moribund. Adapt or die. > > Steve > > P.S.: SGML was "too hard", too. The transformation into XML involved > shedding features that, in retrospect, were solutions to problems that had > once been considered compelling. And that excludes a shift (for some?) to json Steve? A call for a broader church perhaps? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|