[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: What are the practical, negative consequences of thinkingt

• From: Thomas Passin <list1@tompassin.net>
• To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
• Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:15:00 -0500

I agree with Eliot. Both XML and JSON are relevant and both have
their own strengths. What matters in the end is that this is all
arborescent, semi-structured data, and that both, in the end, need
the same kind of technology (parsing, validating, transforming,
querying, updating, storing, etc).

• References:
  • What are the practical, negative consequences of thinking thatattributes are metadata?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
  • Re: What are the practical, negative consequences ofthinking that attributes are metadata?
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
  • Re: What are the practical, negative consequences ofthinking that attributes are metadata?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
  • RE: What are the practical, negative consequences ofthinking that attributes are metadata?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
  • Re: What are the practical, negative consequences ofthinking that attributes are metadata?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
  • Re: What are the practical, negative consequences of thinkingthat attributes are metadata?
    • From: Thomas Passin <list1@tompassin.net>
  • Re: What are the practical, negative consequences ofthinking that attributes are metadata?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
  • Re: What are the practical, negative consequences ofthinking that attributes are metadata?
    • From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com>
  • RE: What are the practical, negative consequences ofthinking that attributes are metadata?
    • From: "Ghislain Fourny" <gfourny@inf.ethz.ch>