[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Are you an XML scientist? Do you observe data in the wild and thencreate
Hi Folks, A physicist observes nature and then creates a model of what he observed. The model often takes the form of a mathematical equation. A linguist observes usage of a language and then creates a model of what he observed. The model often takes the form of a context-free grammar. This is nicely expressed by the following passage from a wonderful book that I am reading: If we ignore enough detail we can recognize an underlying context-free structure in the sentences of a natural language, for example, English: Sentence --> Subject Verb Object Subject --> NounPhrase Object --> NounPhrase ... So the physicist and the linguist behave in much the same way: they observe nature and then model its laws/structure. Here's another relevant passage from the book that I am reading: Scenario: you observe a pattern in the strings that you are dealing with. So you create a grammar to describe the pattern. Do you do this? Do you follow the same mode of behavior as the physicist and the linguist when creating XML: do you observe streams and collections of data in the wild, determine the data's inherent structure, and then create a model (grammar) to reflect the structure? How do you ensure that the XML you create reflects the structure of the data? How do you determine the structure of data? Would you share a story of how you observed, determined structure, and then created a model (XML grammar) of the data? /Roger
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|