[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: RFC for XML Object Parsing - New Thought
- From: Brian Aberle <xmlboss@live.com>
- To: John Cowan <johnwcowan@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:42:22 -0600
John, This will work then based on knowing that PI's can be scoped. I don't even need to build a PI table to parse this design since a "Current PI" WILL ALWAYS MATCH the element to follow. This avoid XML's un-orderable attributes, um problem. It adds more markup in terms of data size. It takes away (a little) from the "beautiful" readability of XML. It WILL WORK and I would need a day to tweak XMLFoundation to support that. One (small) drawback is that "cut and paste" of XML in an editor could be made invalid by not pairing Element PI's properly. That cant happen with the smaller foot printed OID as #1 attribute. Perhaps the #1 placed OID should have a PI equivalent to support any existing environment that cannot easily add an ordered attribute 1st prior to writing the rest of the attributes. This is some good thought. huh? Brian
From: johnwcowan@gmail.com Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:13:18 -0400 To: xmlboss@l... CC: xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: RFC for XML Object Parsing - New Thought
|
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0 |
|
Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|