[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: The Allure of Gothic Markup

• From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
• To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
• Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:38:09 +0000

Hi Folks,

Simon's paper invites us to challenge our commonly held beliefs:

Belief:
	- scalable is good
	- if you create an XML vocabulary and it gets 
	  used by only a few systems, it's a failure
	- an XML vocabulary that is used by thousands 
	  is good, millions is better

Counterargument: 
	- individuality is good
	- combining XML fragments to create an XML 
	  vocabulary which meets the needs of a 
	  recipient -- ah, now that's the way to create XML

Belief:
	- contracts are good
	- create XML Schemas and require all information 
	  exchanges adhere to that XML Schema contract. 

Counterargument: 
	- infinite replication is lousy 
	- it is not good to have every house in a neighborhood 
	  look identical, nor is it good to have every XML 
	  instance look the same. 

/Roger

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The Allure of Gothic Markup
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
  • Re: The Allure of Gothic Markup
    • From: "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy@omsys.com>

• References:
  • The Allure of Gothic Markup
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
  • Re: The Allure of Gothic Markup
    • From: "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy@omsys.com>
  • RE: The Allure of Gothic Markup
    • From: David Lee <dlee@calldei.com>
  • Re: The Allure of Gothic Markup
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>