[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: PLOS blog about relative merits of XML (JATS) andHTML in w
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 22:43 +0100, Peter Flynn wrote: > On 06/10/2013 11:04 PM, Sheila M. Morrissey wrote: > [...] > > Her query If XML is being used as an interchange format only, what > > do we gain from moving the XML piece of the workflow any further > > upstream from final delivery? > > The canonical answer is usually the ability to service multiple delivery > formats from a single master. > > Plus the preservability of a plaintext self-describing file format (if > the document is regarded as worth preserving for posterity). > > But publishers don't usually see either of these as a source of revenue. Currently a lot of publishers edit in MS Word, convert to InDesign (or Quark), make PDF for print, then take the print file and try to turn it into an eBook; Amazon will even use OCR if necessary. Some other publishers prefer to go to XML "early" (e.g. right after the editing in Word, or sometimes pushing it all the way to the authors by supplying tools), use an XML-based formatter (e.g. RenderX or Antenna House Publisher) to generate print, use the same XML file to generate ebooks/epub in multiple formats, have a higher quality product for a lower cost, and get to market with the ebook days, weeks or even months sooner. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|