[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote: > > > >>> Below if as the result of changes to the structure in the XMLe any of >>> the elements "some" "path" or "to" change, disappear, become reodered, >>> or now require predicates to be included, changed or removed that test >>> will not work. Note the multitude of things that the test is >>> vulnerable to. > > The key think with test assertions is to assert the minimum required for success. If it's necessary for the column heading of a table to be bold, include that in the assertion; if this is incidental and irrelevant, then don't. XPath is quite flexible enough to enable you to assert what's necessary and ignore what isn't; that's it's great strength. > > Michael Kay > Saxonica Right. But XMLUnit doesn't let you do that because it requires an absolute path (thank you John) to the node you are testing.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|