[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Not using mixed content? Then don't use XML
On 3/25/13 11:22 AM, James Fuller wrote: > Simon sez' >> Those who won't acknowledge that they are sick rarely respond well >> to a diagnosis. Those who make their livings from the continuation >> of the illness - well, that's even more complicated, and a key >> part of the problem we've built. > > Sorry Simon, this statement doesn't float for me (perhaps I am very > ill) ... just because XML went through a gigantic hype curve and got > to the other side, doesn't mean it is 'sick' or 'ill'. It's not about the hype curve. It's about a different kind of epidemiology, in which we "XML folk" are the carriers of a particularly nasty virus. "Waterfall development" is now recognized as a curse in most other cultures, but not so much here. Even when developers work without schemas, so many of our tools expect them that they also carry the virus. We're shocked when those we hope will join us run away, because they can see the brokenness and we (usually) cannot. > It is far too easy with the benefit of hindsight to categorically > state how 'terrible' a certain decision was ... to take an example > from my geologist past, its like saying to Nature how stupid s/he > was when she evolved a species of snake to grow legs, lose them for a > few million to only grow them back again ... 100 million years after > the fact. I don't mind evolution and you shouldn't mind it either. This is not about a single mistake. This is about a culture that continues to make the same mistakes over and over, and has not noticed the resulting shrinkage of its habitat. > Calling it ill, broken culture or otherwise just seems like you are > bitter that XML never gained worldwide dominance Bitter? No, not at all. In many ways, XML punched my ticket perfectly. It was the right subject for me to explain at exactly the right time, fueling my career as a writer and editor. Even the end of its hype curve came at almost exactly the right time for me, freeing me to return to the Web with a much expanded perspective. The people in XML are, generally speaking, the greatest people I've worked with in technology. I suspect that has something to do with Liam's comments about the divide between programmers and text folks, but no, there's no bitterness there either. We failed at the original vision of SGML for the Web, and that's fine. It turns out that the Web didn't actually need SGML. > ... I for one have > never seen the right technology applied by 'crowdsourcing' ... > otherwise we would have a lot more lisp programmers around. XML is > widely deployed and adopted .... move on, we have. This isn't crowdsourcing, and, um... what does crowdsourcing have to do with Lisp? Those feel like very different cultures. > What I find amazing (and what Mr. Brooks was going on about) is if > you choose the right technology at the right moment you can be *a > LOT* more productive over the average approach ... to me xml > technology stack makes me as an individual very productive, but > perhaps thats because the problems I choose to use the tech on > match. If you enjoy the disease, you're unlikely to want a cure. Some diseases are like that. Thanks, -- Simon St.Laurent http://simonstl.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|