[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Performance comparisons of tree models

• From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
• To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
• Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:50:03 +0100

On 12/09/2012 20:27, Mike Sokolov wrote:
> You are correct - our current implementation doesn't cache compiled 
> XPaths, so that cost was included in the comparison.  I suppose we'll 
> want to begin doing that (caching, as we already do for XSLT).
>

If you use the s9api XPath APIs then Saxon caches automatically.

Michael Kay
Saxonica

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Performance comparisons of tree models
    • From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>

• References:
  • Performance comparisons of tree models
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: Performance comparisons of tree models
    • From: Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>
  • Re: Performance comparisons of tree models
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: Performance comparisons of tree models
    • From: Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>