[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?

• From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
• To: Len Bullard <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>
• Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:54:39 +0100

> I may be ill-informed but I think FpML is used for derivatives.  Can
> FpML describe interest rate swaps?  If so:

Yep FpML is used for all types of swaps and other derivatives, but
there is nothing contract specific about it.  That's more likely to be
built into the trading system than the serialisation format.


-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>

• References:
  • Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
  • RE: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
  • RE: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>