[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Conference archives

• From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• To: Len Bullard <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>
• Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:34:18 -0400

Len Bullard scripsit:

> The notion of "self authentication" is ???

Also from WP:

A self-authenticating document, under the law of evidence in the United
States, is any document that can be admitted into evidence at a trial
without proof being submitted to support the claim that the document
is what it appears to be. Several categories of documents are deemed to
be self-authenticating:

1. Certified copy of public or business records;
2. Official publications of government agencies;
3. Newspaper articles;
4. Trade inscriptions, such as labels on products;
5. Acknowledged documents (wherein the signer also gets a paper notarized); and
6. Commercial paper under the Uniform Commercial Code.

-- 
John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
"Make a case, man; you're full of naked assertions, just like Nietzsche."
"Oh, i suffer from that, too.  But you know, naked assertions or GTFO."
                        --heard on #scheme, sorta

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML Conference archives
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>

• References:
  • XML Conference archives
    • From: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: XML Conference archives
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
  • Re: XML Conference archives
    • From: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: XML Conference archives
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
  • RE: XML Conference archives
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>
  • Re: XML Conference archives
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
  • RE: XML Conference archives
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>