[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: MicroXML and &

• From: Mike Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>
• To: liam@w3.org
• Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 08:51:08 -0400

On 6/1/2012 10:25 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:racter References instead.)
> Right. If we want minimal (micromal?) why have to ways of saying "<"?
>
> Liam
>
I think the major confusion around entities always arose from their 
connection to DTDs. Having given up DTDs, MicroXML can then choose to 
build in some predefined entity definitions, or not.  It seems like a 
small issue?  But on the whole I think it would cause *more* confusion 
rather than less to drop &lt and &amp.  People are probably more 
familiar with those than with the numeric references. Just a feeling.

Mike

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>

• References:
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: David Lee <dlee@calldei.com>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
  • RE: MicroXML and &
    • From: David Lee <dlee@calldei.com>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>