[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: MicroXML and &
Original Message From: "John Cowan" > It's required in XML, because if you need to have "]]>" in character > content, it has to be written "]]>" or the NCR equivalent. MicroXML > requires all instances of ">" to be ">" for consistency. However, > this is not true in attribute values, primarily for compatibility with > Canonical XML. I would consider requests to change this. Escaping > to > can be a bit of a pain when including example code in XML. It would be nice to say that nobody in their right mind would include ]]> in their documents (unless they were documenting XML!) and we can just turn a blind eye to that XML compatibility issue! (Googling ]]> yields nothing but that might say more about what Google indexes than what is out there.) Pete Cordell Codalogic Ltd Interface XML to C++ the easy way using C++ XML data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes. Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com for more info
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|