[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: MicroXML and &

• From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 22:31:16 -0400

On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 22:16 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Liam R E Quin scripsit:
> 
> > Right. If we want minimal (micromal?) why have two ways of saying "<"?
> 
> For the sake of error avoidance.

Good point.


-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/

• References:
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: David Lee <dlee@calldei.com>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
  • RE: MicroXML and &
    • From: David Lee <dlee@calldei.com>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
  • Re: MicroXML and &
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>