[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RDDL is bad, replace it with my RDF

• From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
• To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
• Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:00:06 +0300

I think to place an XHTML code (so called RDDL) at a namespace URL was a really bad idea. This URL is intended for computers not people, whilst XHTML is intended for people not computers.

Even if someone will oppose me, I will insist lobbying placing RDF code at NS URLs. I will provide a link from my RDF into an RDDL however.

I remind the readers of this message, that I am developing RDF describing namespaces, the main feature of this is description of transformations between namespaces.

You can read the current draft as a Word 97 file:

http://freesoft.portonvictor.org/binaries/Namespace_Semantic.doc

I started this writing about XML a few months ago, but haven't been working on it for a while. Note that I also work in abstract mathematics and in Hebrew Bible study. I am going (but don't promise) that this month I will work mainly on XML.

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDDL is bad, replace it with my RDF
    • From: Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com>
  • Re: RDDL is bad, replace it with my RDF
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
  • Re: RDDL is bad, replace it with my RDF
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>