[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type

• From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• To: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
• Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:51:48 +0100

On 13/04/2012 13:36, Rushforth, Peter wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> @xml:href

As far as I understand your suggestion, having built in link semantics
was part of the original 3-part plan for XML (along with styling)
but that's xlink:href rather than xml:href. I can't see that adding
another standardised href attribute in addition to xlink's would be that
popular (especially given that xlink isn't exactly the most successful
part of xml)

David



________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
    • From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>

• References:
  • xml:href, xml:rel and xml:type
    • From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>