[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?

• From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• To: Michael Hopwood <michael@editeur.org>
• Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:41:48 -0500

Michael Hopwood scripsit:

> Yes, fair points. How far does the term "data architect" sum up some of
> these? I guess it relates to being able to design schemas / transforms
> that take into account all of these. And the focus is on the data,
> and its structure here. In the library world, we pretty much call
> that cataloguing, or systems librarianship. But then our schemas move
> pretty slowly...

I'm going to put "Ontologist" on my tax returns this year and see what
the IRS makes of it.

-- 
Mark Twain on Cecil Rhodes:                    John Cowan
I admire him, I freely admit it,               http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and when his time comes I shall                cowan@ccil.org
buy a piece of the rope for a keepsake.

• References:
  • Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>
  • Re: Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • RE: Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
    • From: Michael Hopwood <michael@editeur.org>
  • RE: Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@ses-i.com>
  • RE: Should XML Professionals Be Programmers?
    • From: Michael Hopwood <michael@editeur.org>