[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existingX
- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:14:12 +0000
On 06/02/2012 23:32, Cox, Bruce wrote:
CF8C455705AFA345ABCC709D20C6E282D644350B06@EMAIL01.uspto.gov"
type="cite">
To
give an example, the patent business model has been very
stable for about a hundred years. True, the vocabulary has
changed
Really? As far as I can see, patents still use the word "plurality"
as often as they can, and I still don't know if it means "one or
more", "two or more", or "zero or more".
Michael Kay
Saxonica
|
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0 |
|
Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|