[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Schematron and RNG, RNC

• From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• To: Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com>
• Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:01:08 -0500

Alex Muir scripsit:

> Well the other thing I'm not clear on is that for the RNG the schematron
> logic can be placed after the top level grammar element,, for the RNC I'm
> getting syntax error

I don't understand that.  An element placed after the document (top-level)
element would not be well-formed XML.

-- 
John Cowan    cowan@ccil.org    http://ccil.org/~cowan
Objective consideration of contemporary phenomena compel the conclusion
that optimum or inadequate performance in the trend of competitive
activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity,
but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be
taken into account. --Ecclesiastes 9:11, Orwell/Brown version

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Schematron and RNG, RNC
    • From: Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com>

• References:
  • Schematron and RNG, RNC
    • From: Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com>
  • Re: Schematron and RNG, RNC
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
  • Re: Schematron and RNG, RNC
    • From: Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com>
  • Re: Schematron and RNG, RNC
    • From: Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com>