[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of anexisting X
- From: "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV>
- To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, "xml-dev@l..."<xml-dev@l...>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:40:42 -0500
If you still donât know what it means, Michael, then the lawyers were successful. Truly, their goal is to obtain the broadest possible scope in a claim, so any ambiguity is calculated, not accidental. Bruce B Cox OCIO/AED/Software Architecture and Engineering Division 571-272-9004 From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@saxonica.com] Sent: 2012 February 6, Monday 19:14 To: xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention? On 06/02/2012 23:32, Cox, Bruce wrote: To give an example, the patent business model has been very stable for about a hundred years. True, the vocabulary has changed Really? As far as I can see, patents still use the word "plurality" as often as they can, and I still don't know if it means "one or more", "two or more", or "zero or more".
Michael Kay Saxonica |
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0 |
|
Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|