[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: EXI: was : RE: what's missing in XML?What's comi
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 10:42 -0500, Alessandro Triglia wrote: > > There were over a dozen binary encodings of XML identified as being in > > at least moderately significant use at around the time of the Workshop. > > > > I don't have references without going digging, sorry. Fast Infoset was > > obviously one; as I recall that was one where mixed content wasn't > > initially supported at all. > > > You are wrong. > > Fast Infoset is what its name implies: a compact representation of the XML > Infoset. Thanks for replying! I don't (as I said) remember which ones did/do and didn't/don't handle mixed content, only that there were some. Possibly earlier versions of Fast Web Services?? But I'm right that Fast Infoset was/is a binary encoding of XML :-) Maybe we need a wikipedia page listing all the binary XML encodings out there? Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|