[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?

• From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
• To: dlee@calldei.com
• Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:20:33 +0000

On 11 December 2011 17:12, David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> match="block"
>
> match="block/block"
>
> match="block/block/block"
>
> ==============================
>
> Yes but try to that  for an arbitrary deep occurrence.

What sort of arbitrary deep occurrence?


-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com

• References:
  • Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: Cecil New <cecil.new@gmail.com>
  • RE: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
  • RE: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com>