[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: [xquery-talk] [ANN] Zorba 2.0: complete XQuery/XSLT pr

• From: Chris Burdess <dog@bluezoo.org>
• To: Daniela Florescu <dflorescu@mac.com>
• Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:32:02 +0100

Daniela Florescu wrote:
> How many people use XSLT 1.0 vs. 2.0 ?

I have only ever used XSLT 1.0 in practice. This is partly because (as previously mentioned) there is a lack of open XSLT 2.0 processors available, especially on Linux. However the main reason is that I don't see a compelling reason to use the features of XSLT 2.0, which appear to be primarily centred around support for XSD datatypes. If you use XSLT for publishing or content management rather than for enterprisey typed data manipulation in PSVIs, 1.0 is quite sufficient.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: [xquery-talk] [ANN] Zorba 2.0: complete XQuery/XSLTprocessor (C++, open source, Apache license)
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: Re: [xquery-talk] [ANN] Zorba 2.0: complete XQuery/XSLTprocessor (C++, open source, Apache license)
    • From: Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com>
  • Re: Re: [xquery-talk] [ANN] Zorba 2.0: completeXQuery/XSLT processor (C++, open source, Apache license)
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>

• References:
  • [ANN] Zorba 2.0: complete XQuery/XSLT processor (C++,open source,Apache license)
    • From: Daniela Florescu <dflorescu@mac.com>
  • RE: [xquery-talk] [ANN] Zorba 2.0: complete XQuery/XSLT processor(C++, open source, Apache license)
    • From: Geert Josten <geert.josten@daidalos.nl>
  • Re: [xquery-talk] [ANN] Zorba 2.0: complete XQuery/XSLT processor(C++, open source, Apache license)
    • From: Daniela Florescu <dflorescu@mac.com>