[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: An elegant implementation of an XML graph traversal

• From: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>
• To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
• Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:08:23 -0400

> Thus, the XML document is a graph and it consists of two loops 
> (cycles): A -> B -> D -> A and A -> C -> D -> A

No, that's some language you're defining that is derived from XML, but not 
XML itself.  I have no idea what the semantics of Include/@idref are.

Sorry to be pedantic, but ... no, actually, I'm not sorry. :)  After all, 
if I said that SOAP 1.1 encoding rules tried to address the many of these 
issues and claimed that this was SOAP addressing an XML issue, folks would 
be up in arms. :)

        /r$

--
STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/soma/

• References:
  • An elegant implementation of an XML graph traversal
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
  • Re: An elegant implementation of an XML graph traversal
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>
  • RE: An elegant implementation of an XML graph traversal
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>