[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Evaluation Criteria for Markup Languages

• From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
• To: "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV>
• Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:14:00 -0400

Cox, Bruce scripsit:

> As Michael said, it's a question of finding the level of abstraction
> that everyone can agree to for exchange purposes while still supporting
> the local needs of a national office.  It's challenging.

Have you looked at OASIS XNAL 2.0
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ciq/ciq.html> for the name and
address parts?  It should be powerful enough for anyone.

-- 
John Cowan   cowan@ccil.org  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Most languages are dramatically underdescribed, and at least one is
dramatically overdescribed.  Still other languages are simultaneously
overdescribed and underdescribed.  Welsh pertains to the third category.
        --Alan King

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Evaluation Criteria for Markup Languages
    • From: "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV>

• References:
  • RE: Evaluation Criteria for Markup Languages
    • From: "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV>
  • RE: Evaluation Criteria for Markup Languages
    • From: cbullard@hiwaay.net
  • RE: Evaluation Criteria for Markup Languages
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com>
  • RE: Evaluation Criteria for Markup Languages
    • From: "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@USPTO.GOV>