[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Namespaces 1.1

• From: Rick Yorgason <rick@firefang.com>
• To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
• Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 14:06:42 -0400

On 25/05/2011 4:28 AM, Pete Cordell wrote:
> So that makes me think, in the IETF they have Experimental RFCs, which
> are proposals whose impact on the net are not obvious. Maybe the W3C
> should do something similar. The implications of an Experimental
> Recomendation would be "We understand that people are interested in
> doing something in this area, and if you want to do something then we
> suggest doing this. But you do so at your own risk."

Actually, if the W3C won't do it, I suppose you could try to submit your 
proposals to the IETF.  I wonder how much resistance there would be to 
such a thing...

-Rick-

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Namespaces 1.1
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>

• References:
  • XML Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Rick Yorgason <rick@firefang.com>
  • Re: XML Namespaces 1.1
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>