[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: DTD vs XSD: No Duplicate Types in (Mixed) ContentModels
On 31/01/2011 14:22, Maik Stührenberg wrote: > But when in mixed content models duplicate types are not allowed -- why > are they allowed in element content models? The additional #PCDATA of a > mixed content model should have only little effect on the question of > determinism, or do I forget anything (maybe the whitespace characters > that are allowed...)? If there is a #PCDATA token you can't use , or ? in dtd only (#PCDATA|a|b|c)* and the deterministic content model rule explictly only applies to element content. http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#sec-element-content > But your declaration is (of course) accepted by the parser because it is > non-ambiguous. However, the question remains: why is the original the requirement to check that teh content model is deterministic os marked as "an error" http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#dt-compat for compatibility (with SGML) "an error" is not "fatal error" and so formally it means that the dtd is in error but a system isn't obliged to report that. It may make it an error, or may just give a warning, or may just work. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|