[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Status of MicroXML?

• From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
• To: Jamie Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>
• Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:08:43 +0000

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 06:14:02 -0800
Jamie Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org> wrote:

> Personal opinions here - and no relation to my namesake in Thailand.
> 
> Pete, what more is required?  Isn't it already written up?   As a true
> subset, it requires nothing from the XML standard itself

How about a parser/something to confirm that your instance *is* uxml?
Drifting into expanding the definition by aim or lack of thought could
be a problem if the recipient has process tools expecting uxml?




-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• References:
  • Status of MicroXML?
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
  • Re: Status of MicroXML?
    • From: Jamie Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>