[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?

• From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>
• To: stephengreenubl@gmail.com
• Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:56:57 +0100

> Maybe a '@ref' attribute on element is still necessary.
> I can't yet imagine how an 'element' element would be
> defined as recursive without being global and referenced
> within itself.

I cannot live without groups and references in my RelaxNG.


> There might need to be attributes for cardinality added
> too. Plus I remember my own arguments for allowing
> datatypes to be defined as either ordered or unordered
> arrays to compete with JSON.

We *always* consider elements to be ordered
Why not simply discard the concept of unordered array for an attribute?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>

• References:
  • Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: John Madden <john.madden@duke.edu>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>