[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Towards XML 2.0

• From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
• Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 10:28:22 +0100

a three random thoughts;

* I would reconsider naming it XML 3.0

* I think the lesson I have learned about creating specs 'by email',
is that a lot of information gets lost, and a lot of energy is
expended, e.g. I would setup a github or wiki asap and move the
primary conversation there ... also setup a date to meet face to face
(or skype teleconf) always helps focuses effort

* Is what is being discussed evolutionary or revolutionary ? The
pragmatist in us all sees a necc incremental evolutionary step ... but
it can't take 1-3 yrs to specify ... more like 1-3 mths to have a
chance of remaining relevant (if that is a goal).

Jim Fuller

• References:
  • Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@ibiblio.org>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@prodigal.ca>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Greg Hunt <greg@firmansyah.com>