[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Multiple instances of an attribute Re: Towards XM

  • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
  • To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:10:41 +0000

Re:  Multiple instances of an attribute Re: Towards XM
> So, what are the circumstances that xml:json="[1,2,3,4,5]" would help over a
> particular vocabulary having data-json="[1,2,3,4,5]" ?

The xml:json would not need a schema to distinguish an unordered list or array
from a sequenced one so the parser would know whether to treat the order as
significant without having to load and understand a schema or be programmed
with being able to read different kinds of schema language, etc. That seems to
me a crucial difference and there may be others.


----
Stephen D Green



On 10 December 2010 10:03, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 09:46, Stephen Green wrote:
>>
>> I was also thinking maybe some xml:xxx features added to XML by the XML WG
>> (rather than the XML Schema WG) might expand attribute functionality in a
>> way which doesn't require a schema
>
>
> why is a schema needed? What is the use case for being able to parse
> xml+json (say) with no prior knowledge of what vocabulary of the xml file is
> using, but being able to detect that particular attributes are json?
>
> To give counter example:
>
> an xsl file has many structured attributes (typically xpath rather than json
> but the issues are similar)
>
> select="(1,2,3,4,5)"
>
> for example. That xpath has many similarities to json, involving sequences
> and integer literals. there is no schema type for xpath, an xslt processor
> just has advance knowledge that the select attribute contains xpath and
> parses it accordingly. A generic XML processor doesn't know that this is
> xpath and just treats the entire attribute as an opaque string, but that's
> OK it wouldn't help if it did know it was xpath, it wouldn't be able to
> evaluate it anyway.
>
> So, what are the circumstances that xml:json="[1,2,3,4,5]" would help over a
> particular vocabulary having data-json="[1,2,3,4,5]" ?
>
> David
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
> and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
> Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
>
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
> powered by MessageLabs.
> ________________________________________________________________________
>


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.