[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: nextml

• From: Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie>
• To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
• Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:54:06 +0000

On 09/12/10 05:37, Michael Sokolov wrote:
> I'm with you most of the way; can I slip in a couple more additions (and
> a few cavils)?
> 
> I think this tiny change would be new to this discussion (and easy to
> implement and backwards compatible since it doesn't affect
> well-formedness?): let's not mandate line-terminator normalization. 

By all means, so long as the facility for normalization in circumstances
where it is required doesn't get thrown out as well.

///Peter

• References:
  • nextml
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
  • Re: nextml
    • From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>