[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Status of MicroXML?

• From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
• To: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
• Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:31:21 +0000

On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:10:13 -0700
Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Am I wrong in this, or has this thread changed to 'lets invent
> > a new schema language'
> >
> 
> To be fair, that's a different thread.  As I read that thread, it's
> more about figuring out what approach to schema for MicroXML will
> offer a worthy level of simplicity.  Yes some are calling for
> something new, but just as many are saying "Just use RNG, Schematron,
> Examplotron, etc."

I think relax NG for uxml would be relatively easy to teach?
Perhaps Schematron if you wanted to check namespace usage
in uxml?



-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• References:
  • Status of MicroXML?
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
  • Re: Status of MicroXML?
    • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
  • Re: Status of MicroXML?
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • Re: Status of MicroXML?
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>