[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
The point of my remark is to insure that MicroXSD will fulfil existing (simple) needs. Imo, validating popular formats (in their microXML variant) seems to be a mandatory requirement for MicroXSD (if we want it to be used). On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> wrote: >> Could you please give me a small idea of the MicroXSD to validate SVG? >> > > Well SVG isn't written as MicroXML so there's no point. > > ---- > Stephen D Green > > > > On 17 December 2010 14:21, Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Stephen Green >> <stephengreenubl@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Ignoring complexTypes and not attempting to be valid XSD, how about >>> just the following? >>> >>> <element name="schema"> >>> <element name="element"> >>> <attribute name="name" type="string"/> >>> <attribute name="type" type="string"> >>> <!-- enumerations = string integer decimal date --> >>> </attribute> >>> </element> >>> <element name="attribute"> >>> <attribute name="name" type="string"/> >>> <attribute name="type" type="string"> >>> <!-- enumerations = string integer decimal date --> >>> </attribute> >>> </element> >>> </element> >>> >>> I think it is valid MicoXML, isn't it, and in the spirit of MicroXML >>> - easy to parse >>> - easy even to execute in MicroXML parsers if need be >>> >>> Or adding a little more and it could be valid XSD too (but that >>> might be going too far in the direction of XSD). >> >> Could you please give me a small idea of the MicroXSD to validate SVG? >> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|