[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Venetian Blinds vs Garden of Eden patterns for industry standards XML Sc
Hi all. I am now involved in developing the next iteration of schemas to standardise information storage and exchange for trademarks and design (there is also some cooperation with patent people). The current standards (TM-XML and DS-XML) use a venetian blind pattern because it nicely mimics OO model, so it's easy to generate classes and objects, also it hides element definitions so there's no conflicts when processing them. Finally the naming convention (not my idea) means that the element names are not reusable anyway. Some people are now proposing that we move to "Garden of Eden" design patter, but I don't see that as a particularly smart move in the context of our domain. I have noticed that many of the schemas in the industry, for instance UBL have gone for Garden of Eden first and and later reverted to Venetian Blinds. I am very interested in some thoughts from the trenches as to why one or the other approach might be more useful in a committee driven standards with contributors from different domains. No need to point me to google either - I have read all the articles about it [1,2,3] and authored schemas that are in production now both ways, but still unconvinced either way... References: [1] A slideshows on various approaches: http://dret.net/lectures/xml-fall08/xsd-2#(11) [2] http://www.xfront.com/GlobalVersusLocal.html - schema best practices [3] http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-schemascope/ etc...
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|