[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RE: Data Interoperability ... Why do some XML vocabularie

• From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
• Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:10:15 +0100

On 20/08/2010 14:33, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> But they all behave the same way (at least theoretically).

they all behave completely differently, some return sax events, some 
return a DOM some return some other tree model at least one returns TeX 
tokens.... There is very little requirement in the XML Recommendation 
for an XML application to return anything at all.

David


________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

• References:
  • Data Interoperability ... Why do some XML vocabularies specifymeaning + behavior whereas others specify only meaning?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
  • RE: Data Interoperability ... Why do some XML vocabularies specifymeaning + behavior whereas others specify only meaning?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
  • Re: RE: Data Interoperability ... Why do some XML vocabulariesspecify meaning + behavior whereas others specify only meaning?
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
  • RE: RE: Data Interoperability ... Why do some XMLvocabularies specify meaning + behavior whereas others specify only meaning?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>