[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: hackable xml

• From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
• To: "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:36:06 +0100

Original Message From: "David Carlisle"


>
> On 27/07/2010 12:33, Pete Cordell wrote:
>>
>> P.S. Surely even IBM mainframes have moved on from EBCDIC?
>
> presumably not, since that was the main (only) justification for the 
> incompatible changes to the white space parsing rules in XML 1.1,

Though XML 1.1 doesn't seem to be getting a vast amount of traction.  My 
impression is that XML 1.0 5th edition has pretty much killed it off.

Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using XML C++
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: hackable xml
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>

• References:
  • hackable xml
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
  • Re: hackable xml
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
  • Re: hackable xml
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: hackable xml
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
  • Re: hackable xml
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>