[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....

• From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
• To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:16:34 -0400

On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 20:03 +0100, David Carlisle wrote:

> bah humbug, you can't do  /h:html/h:head/h:meta in pure xpath either
true. You can do *[local-name() = 'foo'] etc though, which was the
example I'd used earlier. I didn't look closely enough, sorry!

>  The fact is that Xpath2 allows the host language to specify
> the default namespace for elements in queries, and xquery chose to 
> specify that was the same as the default namespace for element 
> construction, which was a bad mistake.
Yes, I agree with you.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org

• References:
  • To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: David <dlee@calldei.com>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Kendall Shaw <kshaw@kendallshaw.com>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>