[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ....

• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
• To: "'Max Toro'" <maxtoroq@gmail.com>
• Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:02:02 +0100

> So, users that are not confused shouldn't worry about 
> namespaces? The problems don't seem too big for such a bad design.

Users who think they don't need to understand namespaces continue to fall
down the rat-hole at an alarming rate, and many of us on this and similar
forums have spent 10 years helping them out of the hole, and like to vent
our frustration occasionally.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay 

• References:
  • To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: David <dlee@calldei.com>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Kendall Shaw <kshaw@kendallshaw.com>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
  • RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Max Toro <maxtoroq@gmail.com>
  • RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Max Toro <maxtoroq@gmail.com>